The Importance of Experience in the Interpretation of Conspecific Chemical Signals

Foraging bumblebees scent mark flowers with hydrocarbon secretions. Several studies have found these scent marks act as a repellent to bee foragers. This was thought to minimize the risk of visiting recently depleted flowers. Some studies, however, have found a reverse, attractive effect of scent ma... Ausführliche Beschreibung

1. Person: Saleh, Nehal
Weitere Personen: Chittka, Lars verfasserin
Quelle: in Behavioral ecology and sociobiology Vol. 61, No. 2 (2006), p. 215-220
Weitere Artikel
Format: Online-Artikel
Sprache: English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Beschreibung: Online-Ressource
Schlagworte: research-article
Context learning
Interference
Cognition
Pheromone
Communication
Repellent
Attractant
Online Zugang: Volltext
Volltext
Tags: Hinzufügen
Keine Tags. Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Anmerkung: Copyright: Copyright 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
LEADER 02439nma a2200373 c 4500
001 JST012330906
003 DE-601
005 20180602155954.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150323s2006 000 0 eng d
024 8 |a 25511575 
024 8 |a 10.1007/s00265-006-0252-7 
035 |a 25511575 
040 |b ger  |c GBVCP 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Saleh, Nehal 
245 1 4 |a The Importance of Experience in the Interpretation of Conspecific Chemical Signals  |h Elektronische Ressource 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
500 |a Copyright: Copyright 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 
520 |a Foraging bumblebees scent mark flowers with hydrocarbon secretions. Several studies have found these scent marks act as a repellent to bee foragers. This was thought to minimize the risk of visiting recently depleted flowers. Some studies, however, have found a reverse, attractive effect of scent marks left on flowers. Do bees mark flowers with different scents, or could the same scent be interpreted differently depending on the bees' previous experience with reward levels in flowers? We use a simple experimental design to investigate if the scent marks can become attractive when bees forage on artificial flowers that remain rewarding upon the bees' return after having depleted them. We contrast this with bees trained in the more natural scenario where revisits to recently emptied flowers are unrewarding. The bees' association between scent mark and reward value was tested with flowers scent marked from the same source. We find that the bees' experience with the level of reward determines how the scent mark is interpreted: the same scent can act as both an attractant and a repellent. How experience and learning influence the interpretation of the meaning of chemical signals deposited by animals for communication has rarely been investigated. 
653 |a research-article 
653 |a Context learning 
653 |a Interference 
653 |a Cognition 
653 |a Pheromone 
653 |a Communication 
653 |a Repellent 
653 |a Attractant 
700 1 |a Chittka, Lars  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i in  |t Behavioral ecology and sociobiology  |d Berlin : Springer  |g Vol. 61, No. 2 (2006), p. 215-220  |q 61:2<215-220  |w (DE-601)JST012329789  |x 1432-0762 
856 4 1 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/25511575  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_JSTOR 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 61  |j 2006  |e 2  |h 215-220 

Ähnliche Einträge

Keine ähnlichen Titel gefunden

Privacy Notice Ask a Librarian New Acquisitions