Expanding the Dialogue: A Response to Bird and Godwin's "Film in the Undergraduate Anthropology Classroom"

This article is a response to S. Elizabeth Bird and Jonathan P. Godwin's article "Film in the Undergraduate Anthropology Classroom: Applying Audience Response Research in Pedagogical Practice." The intention of my response is to expand the dialogue on film use to promote cultural understanding in un... Ausführliche Beschreibung

1. Person: Blum, Denise
Quelle: in Anthropology & education quarterly Vol. 37, No. 3 (2006), p. 300-306
Weitere Artikel
Format: Online-Artikel
Sprache: English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Beschreibung: Online-Ressource
Schlagworte: research-article
Film Pedagogy
Film Reception
Cultural Studies
Media Education Studies
Online Zugang: Volltext
Volltext
Tags: Hinzufügen
Keine Tags. Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Anmerkung: Copyright: Copyright 2006 American Anthropological Association
LEADER 01982nma a2200313 c 4500
001 JST009616373
003 DE-601
005 20180529163935.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150323s2006 000 0 eng d
024 8 |a 3805076 
035 |a 3805076 
040 |b ger  |c GBVCP 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Blum, Denise 
245 1 0 |a Expanding the Dialogue: A Response to Bird and Godwin's "Film in the Undergraduate Anthropology Classroom"  |h Elektronische Ressource 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
500 |a Copyright: Copyright 2006 American Anthropological Association 
520 |a This article is a response to S. Elizabeth Bird and Jonathan P. Godwin's article "Film in the Undergraduate Anthropology Classroom: Applying Audience Response Research in Pedagogical Practice." The intention of my response is to expand the dialogue on film use to promote cultural understanding in university classes and campus-wide. Through participant-observation and the use of surveys over a two-year period, I examine the transformation of participant viewers in various contexts, noting that by limiting our understanding of film to merely the transfer of information, we not only have a limited understanding of our viewers but also have ignored possible avenues for learning. My findings indicate that the "context" for film screening is dependent on the film, the instructor, the post-screening discussant, and the viewers, can yield dramatic results in learning, depending on the ways in which each is engaged. 
653 |a research-article 
653 |a Film Pedagogy 
653 |a Film Reception 
653 |a Cultural Studies 
653 |a Media Education Studies 
773 0 8 |i in  |t Anthropology & education quarterly  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell  |g Vol. 37, No. 3 (2006), p. 300-306  |q 37:3<300-306  |w (DE-601)JST009610030  |x 1548-1492 
856 4 1 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/3805076  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_JSTOR 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 37  |j 2006  |e 3  |h 300-306 

Ähnliche Einträge

Keine ähnlichen Titel gefunden

Privacy Notice Ask a Librarian New Acquisitions