Legitimacy In European Nature Conservation Policy: Case Studies In Multilevel Governance

This volume focuses on the issue of legitimacy in the context of European nature conservation policy. It provides insights in the way in which democratic legitimacy is being ‘produced’ at different levels of governance. Building forth upon recent developments in democracy theory that have identi... Ausführliche Beschreibung

1. Person: Keulartz, Jozef
Weitere Körperschaften: SpringerLink (Online service)
Weitere Personen: Leistra, Gilbert [editor]
Format: E-Buch
Sprache: English
Veröffentlicht: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2008, 2008
Beschreibung: XVI, 284 p online resource
Serien: The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics
Schlagworte: Nature Conservation
Biodiversity
Environment
Regional planning
Environmental sciences
Political Philosophy
Political science / Philosophy
Political Science
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Political science
Online Zugang: Volltext
Volltext
Tags: Hinzufügen
Keine Tags. Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
LEADER 03917nmm a2200385 u 4500
001 EB000359381
003 EBX01000000000000000212433
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 130626 ||| eng
020 |a 9781402065101 
100 1 |a Keulartz, Jozef 
245 0 0 |a Legitimacy In European Nature Conservation Policy  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Case Studies In Multilevel Governance  |c edited by Jozef Keulartz, Gilbert Leistra 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 2008, 2008 
300 |a XVI, 284 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a The Cormorant Case -- Protected Areas -- Legitimacy Problems in Spanish Nature Policy -- How to Deal with Legitimacy in Nature Conservation Policy? -- Resistance to Top-Down Conservation Policy and the Search for New Participatory Models -- Visions and Scales of Nature and Society in Nature Management -- Creation of a Bottom–Up Nature Conservation Policy in Poland -- Nature Conservation in Poland and the Netherlands -- Conservation in Context: A View from below -- Towards Governance and Procedural Legitimacy? -- Countries -- Endangered Legitimacy -- Nature Policy in Flanders -- Between European Injunction and Local Consultation -- The Local Implementation of Nature Policy -- Legitimacy of Biodiversity Policies in a Multi-level Setting -- Are Conflicts of Nature Distributive Conflicts? -- C 
653 |a Nature Conservation 
653 |a Biodiversity 
653 |a Environment 
653 |a Regional planning 
653 |a Environmental sciences 
653 |a Political Philosophy 
653 |a Political science / Philosophy 
653 |a Political Science 
653 |a Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning 
653 |a Political science 
700 1 |a Leistra, Gilbert  |e [editor] 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b Springer  |a Springer eBooks 2005- 
490 0 |a The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics 
856 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6510-1?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 333.72 
520 |a This volume focuses on the issue of legitimacy in the context of European nature conservation policy. It provides insights in the way in which democratic legitimacy is being ‘produced’ at different levels of governance. Building forth upon recent developments in democracy theory that have identified multiple forms of legitimacy, the volume observes a EU-wide shift from output legitimacy to input and throughput legitimacy. Top down policy making is increasingly meeting local resistance. As a result, the importance for policy makers of enhancing the democratic legitimacy of their policy plans has increased. The popularity of deliberative decision-making procedures can be seen as a procedural answer to this state of affairs. For this volume scholars from within the EU were invited to reflect upon the question whether similar developments are taking place in the context with which they are most familiar. Do they perceive a delegitimation of top down policy making and hence an increasing emphasis on procedural legitimacy in processes of nature conservation policy implementation? Which model of democratic decision-making is most helpful to solve the issue of legitimacy in the field of nature conservation policy? How important are national traditions and institutions? What are the tradeoffs between the different types of legitimacy? Nine case studies are presented: two case studies on protected species (geese in the Netherlands, and the great cormorant in Denmark, France and Italy), four case studies that zoom in on specific protected areas (in Spain, Finland, Poland and the UK), and three case studies with a focus on the implementation of Natura 2000 at the country level (Belgium, France and Germany). These case studies are followed by extensive comments 

Ähnliche Einträge

Keine ähnlichen Titel gefunden

Privacy Notice Ask a Librarian New Acquisitions