Editorial Note: Reevaluating Book Reviews: As Scientific Contributions

In the first part of this text, I would like to describe some advantages book reviews offer. The book reviews—providing the fact that they succeed in offering more than just a short content description to the reader—can also contribute to scientific discourses in a similar way regular contributi... Ausführliche Beschreibung

1. Person: Günter Mey verfasserin
Quelle: In Forum: Qualitative Social Research (01.12.2000)
Weitere Artikel
Format: Online-Artikel
Sprache: German
English
Spanish
Veröffentlicht: 2000
Beschreibung: Online-Ressource
Online Zugang: Online
Online
Online
Volltext
Tags: Hinzufügen
Keine Tags. Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
  Creative Commons License Source: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
LEADER 01997nma a2200253 c 4500
001 DOAJ027167194
003 DE-601
005 20190330002617.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171226s2000 000 0 ger d
035 |a (DE-599)DOAJ0416d7866b0049d6b8c26adbc24025d4 
040 |b ger  |c GBVCP 
041 0 |a ger  |a eng  |a spa 
100 0 |a Günter Mey  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Editorial Note: Reevaluating Book Reviews: As Scientific Contributions  |h Elektronische Ressource 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
520 |a In the first part of this text, I would like to describe some advantages book reviews offer. The book reviews—providing the fact that they succeed in offering more than just a short content description to the reader—can also contribute to scientific discourses in a similar way regular contributions do. One of the reasons why book reviews currently often do not fulfil this possible function is due to the existing restrictions within traditional print media publishing. Additionally worth mentioning are actual standards within the scientific community which tend to underestimate the value of book reviews or review essays. In the second part, I will discuss some developmental potentials in book reviews which up to now were hardly recognized: Especially with the Internet and its characteristics-nearly unlimited space resources; flexible publishing time and design of the contributions; chance for a direct exchange between researchers, for example using discussion boards—a re-evaluation of book reviews and review essays seems to be possible and reasonable. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003400 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Forum: Qualitative Social Research  |g  (01.12.2000)  |w (DE-601)DOAJ000021342  |x 1438-5627 
856 4 0 |y DOAJ  |u https://doaj.org/article/0416d7866b0049d6b8c26adbc24025d4 
856 4 0 |u http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1057 
856 4 0 |u https://doaj.org/toc/1438-5627 
912 |a GBV_DOAJ 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 2000  |b 01  |c 12 

Ähnliche Einträge

Keine ähnlichen Titel gefunden

Privacy Notice Ask a Librarian New Acquisitions